icon

Case Study: Ankle Pain Misdiagnosis – Sural Nerve Entrapment Mimicking Achilles Tendinopathy

Our Patient


Our patient is a 42 year-old male recreational runner complaining of posterior heel pain. His symptoms – pain during running and stair climbing, tenderness upon palpation, and early morning stiffness – had persisted for the past 8 months. He had a history of running overload.

The Challenge


The patient had sought treatment at another clinic, with no satisfactory results. Based on reported symptoms and MRI results, he had been diagnosed with mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy, and treated with conservative care,

His treatment protocol included:

  • 6 sessions of shockwave therapy directed at the Achilles tendon
  • TECAR radiofrequency therapy
  • Physical therapy, including progressive eccentric loading of the Achilles – a standard protocol for Achilles tendinopathy

Despite treatment, his symptoms persisted, and even worsened slightly after shockwave therapy.

Our Diagnostic Process


During the clinical exam, we questioned the patient to obtain more details about the quality and distribution of his pain. He described the pain as “burning and sharp,” and radiating toward the lateral foot. The foot was hypersensitive to pressure from socks and footwear, and he reported nighttime discomfort. An inverted ankle stretch worsened his pain symptoms.

A focused physical exam revealed:

  • A mildly thickened Achilles tendon.
  • Absence of central tenderness, but marked tenderness 1-2 cm lateral to the tendon.
  • Positive Tinel sign – a diagnostic test for nerve compression – posterior to the lateral malleolus (the knob-like bone on the outside of the ankle).
  • Sensitivity to light touch.
  • Pain reproduced by tension applied to the sural nerve.

At this point we suspected sural nerve entrapment.

Diagnostic ultrasonography confirmed our suspicions:

  • Focal enlargement at the lateral ankle.
  • Hypoechoic fascicles, with loss or normal crispness.
  • Mild perineural edema.
  • Symptoms reproduced with sonopalpation.
  • Pain reproduced with dynamic inversion and dorsiflexion.

The sural nerve appeared to be entrapped at the fascial crossing, posterior to the lateral malleolus, with symptoms mimicking Achilles tendinopathy.

Our Treatment Protocol


To release the nerve and restore gliding, we performed an ultrasound-guided hydrodissection procedure. We positioned the needle superior to the nerve and injected a 5% dextrose solution (D5W), with a small amount of hyaluronic acid. The procedure successfully released the nerve, resulting in immediate pain relief.

Results


The patient saw a 70% improvement within 48 hours, and reported 90-100% pain resolution at the 2-week follow-up. He was able to return to a progressive running program, and was completely asymptomatic at the 3-month follow-up.

Discussion


Prior to visiting our clinic the patient had sought treatment elsewhere, where he received shockwave and radiofrequency therapy, and physical therapy. Due to misdiagnosis, the shockwaves were directed at the Achilles tendon, and not the nerve, failing to provide relief. Radiofrequency therapy provided minor temporary relief, but was ineffective in decompressing the nerve. During physical therapy, the eccentric loading protocol increased tension on the nerve, exacerbating irritation.

Rather than proceeding with the initial diagnosis, we took a closer look at the pain quality and location, and used dynamic ultrasonography to uncover the true pathology – an entrapped sural nerve.

Key Takeaways


Doctors are often quick to diagnose posterior heel pain as Achilles tendinopathy, and in this case, abnormal MRI results — which are common in asymptomatic runners — contributed to the misdiagnosis. When the problem is neural entrapment, treatment directed at the tendon is bound to fail.

In our case, proper and thorough diagnosis backed by dynamic ultrasonography led to appropriate and successful treatment, with a single injection completely resolving the patient’s condition.

Verified Expert Profiles

About the Author

Dr. Lev Kalika is a world-recognized expert in musculoskeletal medicine. with 20+ years of clinical experience in diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasonography, rehabilitative sports medicine and conservative orthopedics. In addition to operating his clinical practice in Manhattan, he regularly publishes peer-reviewed research on ultrasound-guided therapies and procedures. He serves as a peer reviewer for Springer Nature.

Dr. Kalika is an esteemed member of multiple professional organizations, including:
  • International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment (ISMST)
  • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)
  • American Academy of Orthopedic Medicine(AAOM)
  • Fascia research Society (FRS)
  • Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Society (GCMAS)
  • Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society
Dr. Kalika is the only clinician in New York certified by the ISMST to perform extracorporeal shockwave therapy. He has developed his own unique approach to dynamic functional and fascial ultrasonography and has published peer-reviewed research on the topic. Dr. Kalika is a specialist in orthobiologics, a certified practitioner of Stecco Fascial Manipulation, and serves as a consultant for STT Systems – Motion Analysis & Machine Vision.
bg

In this instance, an athlete was originally diagnosed with minor quadriceps muscle strain and was treated for four weeks, with unsatisfactory results. When he came to our clinic, the muscle was not healing, and the patients’ muscle tissue had already begun to atrophy.

Upon examination using MSUS, we discovered that he had a full muscle thickness tear that had been overlooked by his previous provider. To mitigate damage and promote healing, surgery should have been performed immediately after the injury occurred. Because of misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment, the patient now has permanent damage that cannot be corrected.

The most important advantage of Ultrasound over MRI imaging is its ability to zero in on the symptomatic region and obtain imaging, with active participation and feedback from the patient. Using dynamic MSUS, we can see what happens when patients contract their muscles, something that cannot be done with MRI. From a diagnostic perspective, this interaction is invaluable.

Dynamic ultrasonography examination demonstrating
the full thickness tear and already occurring muscle atrophy
due to misdiagnosis and not referring the patient
to proper diagnostic workup

Demonstration of how very small muscle defect is made and revealed
to be a complete tear with muscle contraction
under diagnostic sonography (not possible with MRI)

image

Complete tear of rectus femoris
with large hematoma (blood)

image

Separation of muscle ends due to tear elicited
on dynamic sonography examination

Request TelehealthRequest Telehealth Request in office visit Book now