icon

Case Study: Instability-Induced Posterior Hip Pain

In such cases, an integrative approach is called for:

Our patient is a young, slender adult female reporting 7 months of severe posterior buttock pain. The pain radiated to her mid-posterior thigh and sometimes toward the rectal/perineal area. There was no numbness or tingling reported, and no clear patterns were found linking her pain to a specific nerve

The Challenge

The patient had already seen multiple orthopedic surgeons, pain specialists, and physiotherapists at major New York health care centers, and had undergone multiple spinal MRIs, with no major findings. She had been treated with epidural steroid injections and oral steroids, which failed to relieve her pain.

Our Diagnostic Process

Upon reviewing the patient’s health history, we found that she had never received a dynamic exam of her hip and pelvic region – the clinicians who treated her relied solely on static images that were not clinically relevant to her reported pain.

Clinical Exam

Our clinical exam revealed marked hip hypermobility, to the point of borderline Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Her internal hip rotation at 90° flexion reached approximately 75°, consistent with capsuloligamentous insufficiency – a condition where the supporting joint capsule and ligaments become weakened, stretched, or damaged, leading to instability.

Ultrasound Exam

We used high resolution ultrasound to dynamically examine the patient’s hip and pelvis.
Our findings revealed:

  • Severe hip micro-instability, with no nerve impingement.
  • Abnormal femoral head translation during movement.
  • Non-coaxial, turbulent rotation, as opposed to smooth, concentric movement around a stable axis, as seen in a healthy hip.
  • Tearing of the anterior labrum, with no detachment. This was not a pain generator, but a sign of chronic joint overload due to instability.
  • Reactive changes in the iliopsoas, indicating over-recruitment of the secondary stabilizers due to hip instability. The obturator internus muscle was hypertrophied and showed excessive active range of motion.
  • The posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN) was thickened and hypoechoic, coursing over the hypertrophied obturator internus.
  • We were able to reproduce the patient’s symptoms using sonopalpation – manipulation of the ultrasound probe.

We concluded that the patient’s hip instability was responsible for her pain symptoms, which explained why there was posterior thigh pain and occasional rectal pain with no paresthesia, and why epidural injections and oral steroids did not relieve her pain.

Our Treatment Protocol

We took the following steps to alleviate the patient’s posterior hip pain:

  1. We treated the hip capsule and pelvis with prolotherapy and conducted hydrodissection of the PFCN nerve.
  2. We used high intensity laser therapy to address neuropathic pain.
  3. We used extracorporeal magneto-transduction therapy (EMTT) to decrease intra-articular inflammation.
  4. Our physical therapy protocol focused on intrinsic hip and pelvic stability, and gait retraining.

Symptoms diminished by 30% after the initial prolotherapy injections, and by 80% after the second round. After completing targeted physical therapy, the patient was able to return to the gym, within four months of her first visit.

Discussion

In hypermobility-related hip instability, posterior pain does not indicate posterior capsule tightening – it reflects the failure of posterior structures to adequately compensate for excessive motion of the femoral head. In such cases, static MRI imaging is insufficient to identify the mechanisms behind the symptoms. Only when viewed with dynamic ultrasound were we able to identify the functional mechanisms of pain.

Our multifaceted treatment approach included orthobiologics, energy technologies, and customized physical therapy that helped to restore hip and pelvic stability and eliminate the compensation patterns that were the source of pain. Our integrative approach, backed by advanced imaging and therapeutic technologies, led to successful outcomes that could not be achieved with conventional methodologies.

Verified Expert Profiles

About the Author

Dr. Lev Kalika is a world-recognized expert in musculoskeletal medicine. with 20+ years of clinical experience in diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasonography, rehabilitative sports medicine and conservative orthopedics. In addition to operating his clinical practice in Manhattan, he regularly publishes peer-reviewed research on ultrasound-guided therapies and procedures. He serves as a peer reviewer for Springer Nature.

Dr. Kalika is an esteemed member of multiple professional organizations, including:
  • International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment (ISMST)
  • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)
  • American Academy of Orthopedic Medicine(AAOM)
  • Fascia research Society (FRS)
  • Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Society (GCMAS)
  • Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society
Dr. Kalika is the only clinician in New York certified by the ISMST to perform extracorporeal shockwave therapy. He has developed his own unique approach to dynamic functional and fascial ultrasonography and has published peer-reviewed research on the topic. Dr. Kalika is a specialist in orthobiologics, a certified practitioner of Stecco Fascial Manipulation, and serves as a consultant for STT Systems – Motion Analysis & Machine Vision.
bg

In this instance, an athlete was originally diagnosed with minor quadriceps muscle strain and was treated for four weeks, with unsatisfactory results. When he came to our clinic, the muscle was not healing, and the patients’ muscle tissue had already begun to atrophy.

Upon examination using MSUS, we discovered that he had a full muscle thickness tear that had been overlooked by his previous provider. To mitigate damage and promote healing, surgery should have been performed immediately after the injury occurred. Because of misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment, the patient now has permanent damage that cannot be corrected.

The most important advantage of Ultrasound over MRI imaging is its ability to zero in on the symptomatic region and obtain imaging, with active participation and feedback from the patient. Using dynamic MSUS, we can see what happens when patients contract their muscles, something that cannot be done with MRI. From a diagnostic perspective, this interaction is invaluable.

Dynamic ultrasonography examination demonstrating
the full thickness tear and already occurring muscle atrophy
due to misdiagnosis and not referring the patient
to proper diagnostic workup

Demonstration of how very small muscle defect is made and revealed
to be a complete tear with muscle contraction
under diagnostic sonography (not possible with MRI)

image

Complete tear of rectus femoris
with large hematoma (blood)

image

Separation of muscle ends due to tear elicited
on dynamic sonography examination

Request TelehealthRequest Telehealth Request in office visit Book now