icon

Case Study: SI Joint Pain in Young Adult Female

Our Patient


Our patient is a 26 year-old female and former ballet dancer, complaining of hip, groin, and lower back pain. She presented with multiple symptoms of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and had recently undergone surgery for endometriosis.

The Challenge


The patient had previously seen multiple physical therapists, with no satisfactory results. She had received bilateral platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections into both of her adductor longus insertion sites, but continued to experience groin pain. MRI had revealed multiple bulging discs, which were treated with epidural steroid injections,
with no positive results.

Our Diagnostic Process


Clinical Exam

Our clinical exam included a medical history review and physical exam, followed by standardized testing.

Our most remarkable findings were:

  • Pain provocation during an adductor stress test.
  • Pain during SI ligament shear testing.
  • Notable hip hypermobility.
  • Multiple densification sites in the abdominal wall.

Ultrasound Imaging


Imaging with high resolution ultrasound revealed a lesion of the Pyramidalis-Anterior Pubic Ligament-Adductor Longus Complex (PLAC), a common athletic injury where the proximal adductor tendon tears away from the pubic bone. The pubic symphysis, suprapubic ligaments, and SI joint ligaments appeared normal. We also observed multiple densifications along the abdominal sheath.

The patient was unable to engage her abdominal muscles adequately to stabilize her pelvis, and her hypermobile ligaments could not stabilize her anterior or posterior pelvic ring. Despite normal appearance on ultrasound, the SI ligaments were not able to compensate for lack of abdominal engagement due to multiple abdominal incisions from her previous endometriosis surgery.

It soon became clear that her hypermobile hips were placing stress on the SI ligaments, and that her symptoms of groin pain were likely related to SI joint dysfunction. In this case, the SI ligaments were pain generators, not only for lower back pain, but also for groin pain.

Our Treatment Approach


The patient’s SI ligaments and pubic symphysis were injected with a Prolotherapy solution of D5W, which reduced all of her pain symptoms by 70%, making physical therapy possible. We also used fascial manipulation to restore gliding of the recto-abdominal sheath, which restored coordinated abdominal muscle activation for improved stabilization.

Discussion


When evaluating patients with lumbopelvic pain, we need to consider factors affecting pelvic stability, even when imaging of ligaments appears normal. This is especially in cases of joint hypermobility or EDS. In such cases, imaging alone is insufficient – the clinical evaluation and stress testing results must be relied on to guide professional reasoning.

Verified Expert Profiles

About the Author

Dr. Lev Kalika is a world-recognized expert in musculoskeletal medicine. with 20+ years of clinical experience in diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasonography, rehabilitative sports medicine and conservative orthopedics. In addition to operating his clinical practice in Manhattan, he regularly publishes peer-reviewed research on ultrasound-guided therapies and procedures. He serves as a peer reviewer for Springer Nature.

Dr. Kalika is an esteemed member of multiple professional organizations, including:
  • International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment (ISMST)
  • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)
  • American Academy of Orthopedic Medicine(AAOM)
  • Fascia research Society (FRS)
  • Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Society (GCMAS)
  • Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society
Dr. Kalika is the only clinician in New York certified by the ISMST to perform extracorporeal shockwave therapy. He has developed his own unique approach to dynamic functional and fascial ultrasonography and has published peer-reviewed research on the topic. Dr. Kalika is a specialist in orthobiologics, a certified practitioner of Stecco Fascial Manipulation, and serves as a consultant for STT Systems – Motion Analysis & Machine Vision.
bg

In this instance, an athlete was originally diagnosed with minor quadriceps muscle strain and was treated for four weeks, with unsatisfactory results. When he came to our clinic, the muscle was not healing, and the patients’ muscle tissue had already begun to atrophy.

Upon examination using MSUS, we discovered that he had a full muscle thickness tear that had been overlooked by his previous provider. To mitigate damage and promote healing, surgery should have been performed immediately after the injury occurred. Because of misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment, the patient now has permanent damage that cannot be corrected.

The most important advantage of Ultrasound over MRI imaging is its ability to zero in on the symptomatic region and obtain imaging, with active participation and feedback from the patient. Using dynamic MSUS, we can see what happens when patients contract their muscles, something that cannot be done with MRI. From a diagnostic perspective, this interaction is invaluable.

Dynamic ultrasonography examination demonstrating
the full thickness tear and already occurring muscle atrophy
due to misdiagnosis and not referring the patient
to proper diagnostic workup

Demonstration of how very small muscle defect is made and revealed
to be a complete tear with muscle contraction
under diagnostic sonography (not possible with MRI)

image

Complete tear of rectus femoris
with large hematoma (blood)

image

Separation of muscle ends due to tear elicited
on dynamic sonography examination

Request TelehealthRequest Telehealth Request in office visit Book now