Faster Recoveries After ACL Reconstructions: The Exciting Potential of Electro-Stimulation

Faster Recoveries After ACL Reconstructions: The Exciting Potential of Electro-Stimulation  Blog

In the center of each of your knees, there’s an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). These ligaments are positioned diagonally. ACL injuries are fairly common, especially for athletes. To repair the damage, surgeons will sometimes graft tissues onto an ACL. That operation is an ACL reconstruction.

After such a reconstruction, it’s easy for the muscles around the knee, including the hamstrings and the quadriceps, to weaken as they’re not being utilized enough. Exercises can help the situation. But, increasingly, doctors are prescribing electrical muscle stimulation, which is also known as electro-stimulation, to aid their patients.

A Groundbreaking Study

In 2012, the medical journal “Clinical Rehabilitation” published the results of a study that examined the effects of electro-stimulation on ACL reconstruction patients. This survey was set up as follows:

  • A total of 28 participants underwent five weekly rehabilitation sessions over the course of six weeks.
  • Half of those individuals performed exercises and were given ice during their sessions.
  • The other 14 subjects exercised and received icing, and they also underwent 20 minutes of electro-stimulation each time.

A Series of Discoveries

The results of this study were clear. The people who were administered electro-stimulation saw their swelling go down considerably after the first week. They experienced less pain as well. These three benefits were also noteworthy:

  • After two weeks and again after eight weeks, they showed fewer signs of muscle atrophy.
  • After two weeks, eight weeks, and 12 weeks, they could extend their knees further than the members of the group that wasn’t getting electro-stimulation.
  • After 12 weeks, their knees were more functional in general.

Reasons to Be Hopeful

Granted, this research project was merely a pilot study. Among its deficiencies, it didn’t have a large group of subjects, and it didn’t involve a placebo. Nevertheless, it represents a starting point for scientific inquiry into electro-stimulation and ACL reconstruction recovery, and its conclusions are promising.

At this time, it’s almost certain that people who go through ACL reconstruction lose less muscle mass with electro-stimulation treatments than they would if they relied on exercise alone. Now, that’s not to suggest that ACL reconstruction patients should give up exercise altogether. Exercise, of course, is always important for toning muscles and maintaining cardiovascular health. It’s just that, with the help of electro-stimulation, a patient will likely end up dealing with less pain, swelling, and atrophy.

With all of this information in mind, if you’re a doctor or a rehabilitation specialist who works with ACL reconstruction patients, it’s a great idea to learn as much as you can about the electro-stimulation process. People often look forward to their electro-stimulation sessions, which can be really soothing. Indeed, they can ease some of the anxiety that often accompanies injuries.

Then, once your patients realize how much faster they are recuperating, they’re sure to be grateful to you and the electro-stimulation technology that you’ve adopted.

130 West 42 Street Suite 1055, New York NY 10036
bg

In this instance, an athlete was originally diagnosed with minor quadriceps muscle strain and was treated for four weeks, with unsatisfactory results. When he came to our clinic, the muscle was not healing, and the patients’ muscle tissue had already begun to atrophy.

Upon examination using MSUS, we discovered that he had a full muscle thickness tear that had been overlooked by his previous provider. To mitigate damage and promote healing, surgery should have been performed immediately after the injury occurred. Because of misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment, the patient now has permanent damage that cannot be corrected.

The most important advantage of Ultrasound over MRI imaging is its ability to zero in on the symptomatic region and obtain imaging, with active participation and feedback from the patient. Using dynamic MSUS, we can see what happens when patients contract their muscles, something that cannot be done with MRI. From a diagnostic perspective, this interaction is invaluable.

Dynamic ultrasonography examination demonstrating
the full thickness tear and already occurring muscle atrophy
due to misdiagnosis and not referring the patient
to proper diagnostic workup

Demonstration of how very small muscle defect is made and revealed
to be a complete tear with muscle contraction
under diagnostic sonography (not possible with MRI)

image

Complete tear of rectus femoris
with large hematoma (blood)

image

Separation of muscle ends due to tear elicited
on dynamic sonography examination

contact-form-animation
You can call
or Send message