New Approaches for ACL Rehab and Return to Play

bg

After an ACL injury, most athletes who want to return to their pre-injury level of play are told that reconstructive surgery is their only option for full recovery. However, ACL reconstruction (ACLR) neither promotes normal knee function nor reduces the risk of re-injury. Without extensive rehabilitation after an ACL rupture, the athlete’s chance of competition-level recovery is practically nil.

The truth is, even with rehab, only about half of athletes who undergo ACLR successfully return to competitive play, and of those, up to 20% experience a second ACL injury within the first year. In addition, athletes who undergo ACLR have an increased risk of experiencing knee osteoarthritis at an early age.

Injury Risk After ACLR

Rehabilitation is key to recovery and return to play, but not all rehab programs are created equal. Many fail to address changes in kinematics after ACLR that affect motor control and alter force loads on muscles and connective tissue, increasing injury risk.

Risk factors for a second ACL injury are both biomechanical and neuromuscular, and include:

  • Altered hip rotation in the non-injured leg
  • Increased knee movement in the frontal plane during landing
  • Asymmetries in knee movement at initial contact
  • Reduced postural stability in the injured leg

Traditional approaches to ACL rehabilitation often fail to address and correct these motor deficits, reducing the athlete’s likelihood of returning to play at pre-injury levels of performance.

Motor Learning for ACL Rehab

Motor learning is an essential component of rehabilitation after an ACL injury. Altered motor control and loading patterns must be identified and corrected through essential skills retraining. Motor learning is the acquisition of motor skills through practice that yields a permanent desirable change in performance.

When integrated, certain motor learning principles can successfully improve functional performance and support neuroplasticity to reduce the athlete’s risk of re-injury.

Key motor learning principles include:

  • External focus of attention (EFA) During play, an athlete must be continually aware of activities in the surrounding environment. In traditional ACL rehab, the athlete focuses on training the muscles that surround and support the knee. The EFA approach directs the athlete’s attention to movements in the environment, which promotes automatic processes. The results are more efficient movement patterns and increased voluntary activation of the quadriceps.
  • Implicit learning Rather than following explicit instructions provided by a trainer or therapist, implicit learning uses visual imagery to help the athlete “feel” each movement, prompting a more authentic and automatic motor response.
  • Differential learning Every athlete is unique, with distinct individual strengths and limitations, By performing a variety of motor patterns, the athlete is able to find motor solutions that work best for them, within the context of their own limitations, skills and environment.
  • Self-controlled learning Empowering the athlete with some control over exercises and feedback during rehabilitation can greatly facilitate motor learning by increasing motivation, engagement and enjoyment of the rehab process.
  • Contextual interference Variable skills training involves practicing multiple skills in a random order. Interference during variable practice can lead to higher skills learning, yielding better retention and transfer performance.

Motor learning that prepares the athlete’s neuromuscular system for real-world playing scenarios is more likely to restore competition-level skills and reduce the athlete’s risk of re-injury.

C.A.R.E.N for Rehabilitation and Motor Learning

The sports medicine lab at NYDNR is one of a few in the United States to feature C.A.R.E.N, our computer assisted rehabilitation environment.

C.A.R.E.N integrates innovative technology, virtual reality and the latest research-based training approaches to help each athlete regain the skills and confidence that are foundational to peak performance.

C.A.R.E.N gives us the ability to calculate knee joint loads and provide feedback in real time. C.A.R.E.N’s screen can project a 3D musculoskeletal model of the athlete’s body, with muscles lighting up as they are used, while muscle and joint function data are displayed on the screen, providing real-time feedback about imbalances and motor deficits.

C.A.R.E.N enables us to incorporate all 5 key motor learning principles, to support neuroplasticity, restore functional motor skills, and return each athlete to play with enhanced confidence and reduced risk of re-injury. With C.A.R.E.N, athletes can build motor skills in a virtual environment that mimics real-world playing conditions, giving them the best possible chance for complete recovery and return to play.

If you have a knee injury and want to return to competitive play, contact NYDNR today, and get back on the playing field with confidence.

130 West 42 Street Suite 1055, New York NY 10036
bg

In this instance, an athlete was originally diagnosed with minor quadriceps muscle strain and was treated for four weeks, with unsatisfactory results. When he came to our clinic, the muscle was not healing, and the patients’ muscle tissue had already begun to atrophy.

Upon examination using MSUS, we discovered that he had a full muscle thickness tear that had been overlooked by his previous provider. To mitigate damage and promote healing, surgery should have been performed immediately after the injury occurred. Because of misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment, the patient now has permanent damage that cannot be corrected.

The most important advantage of Ultrasound over MRI imaging is its ability to zero in on the symptomatic region and obtain imaging, with active participation and feedback from the patient. Using dynamic MSUS, we can see what happens when patients contract their muscles, something that cannot be done with MRI. From a diagnostic perspective, this interaction is invaluable.

Dynamic ultrasonography examination demonstrating
the full thickness tear and already occurring muscle atrophy
due to misdiagnosis and not referring the patient
to proper diagnostic workup

Demonstration of how very small muscle defect is made and revealed
to be a complete tear with muscle contraction
under diagnostic sonography (not possible with MRI)

image

Complete tear of rectus femoris
with large hematoma (blood)

image

Separation of muscle ends due to tear elicited
on dynamic sonography examination

contact-form-animation
You can call
or Send message