An injury to the anterior cruciate ligament, or ACL, can be debilitating to athletes from all disciplines. This is a serious injury that can ruin your career, and many athletes have a valid fear of this particular sports injury. It is also relatively common in many competitive sports, which only increases the sense of dread that comes with a positive diagnosis. While a certain amount of trepidation is normal, there is often a sense of panic that accompanies the diagnosis of an ACL. Athletes may fear the need for extensive reconstruction of the joint, which involves surgery and extended periods of recovery.
This is an injury with a reputation for keeping athletes away from their sport. After an ACL surgical reconstruction, which is expensive, the athlete may require one or more entire seasons in order to fully recover from the procedure. In addition, the athlete may need to train carefully after the surgery. Even if the patient follows all of the requisite directions for rehabilitation, the injury is often too extensive to allow the athlete to return to playing. This may surprise many in the industry who are aware of the technological breakthroughs around this injury. In fact, the number of athletes who are able to return to their sport is notably low, and this is true even after extensive rehabilitation efforts. Naturally, there is a lingering question in the minds of many athletes around these low numbers. It is a reasonable question because of the advances in rehabilitation technology, surgical improvements and other forms of modern research.
Leading research may provide some useful clues into the low recovery rates of this injury. Besides the fact that the role of qualitative monitoring of patients plays a pivotal role in the outcome, there are other issues that can be addressed directly through the available literature on the subject. For example, the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery released a widely cited publication in 2015 on the care and management of this particular ligament injury. This paper provides the beginnings of the understanding needed to address fundamental clinical questions about the recovery process. For example, the main injury management techniques were standardized. They include MRI, auto-grafting techniques and tendon reconstruction modalities. I found that this conservative approach does not explain the relatively low rates of full recovery.
Based on the available research, I concluded that the best area for focus remains in the mitigation of risk and the development of prevention protocols. Naturally, I will continue to track the literature for additional information on rehabilitation in the future. At the present time, it seems fair to conclude that most conditioning and strengthening exercise have no effect on the prevention of this injury.
The role of impact in female athletes is reserved at the present time for a different topic. The available clues still leave many unanswered questions, so this is the focus of my current research.
Specifically, what are the most pressing measurements to use when evaluating an athlete?
According to Lentz, ACL reconstruction can be measured by the lack of knee effusion, lack of instability events and a minimum score of 93 on a specific scale (Lentz et al, 2012). I will continue to investigate questions of stability, proprioception and confidence in athletes who experience ACL joint reconstruction.
Plantar fasciitis is a painful condition that can severely restrict the patient’s ability to walk, run and enjoy activities. As the weight of the body is added to the foot, the inflammation can make it impossible to function in a normal manner. This problem has created an industry of professionals who are seeking the root […]Read More (0)
If you live a physically active lifestyle, you are bound to have a few aches and pains for time to time. While most exercise-related pain resolves itself with rest, persistent pain that lingers beyond a few days can indicate an injury that should not be ignored. Posterior knee pain is often seen in runners and […]Read More (0)